MSK12 · 6 learning objectives
Treatment of Osteoporosis
LO 1
Explain normal bone remodeling and how osteoporosis drugs alter it
Key questions
Q1What is osteoporosis?
A systemic disease of weakened, fragile bone that raises fracture risk. Bone strength = bone density (BMD) + bone quality. It is "silent" until a fracture occurs.
Q2What is the goal of treatment?
Fracture prevention. Raising BMD matters, but the clinical goal is fewer fractures.
Q3What happens in normal remodeling?
Osteoclasts resorb and osteoblasts form bone in coupled units, maintaining skeletal integrity.
Q4What is the RANKL/OPG system?
RANKL (from osteoblasts/stromal cells) binds RANK on osteoclast precursors and osteoclasts → osteoclast formation and activity. OPG (osteoprotegerin) is a decoy receptor that binds RANKL and blocks it.
Q5What does sclerostin do?
An osteocyte-derived protein that inhibits Wnt signaling → acts as a brake on bone formation.
Q6What shifts the balance toward osteoporosis?
Aging, estrogen deficiency, glucocorticoids, PTH excess and other conditions → resorption > formation.
Q7Which levers do osteoporosis drugs pull?
RANKL (denosumab, estrogen), the osteoclast directly (bisphosphonates), the PTH receptor (teriparatide, abaloparatide), the estrogen receptor (estrogen, raloxifene) or sclerostin (romosozumab).
Q8What non-drug measures come first?
Strength/resistance training ≥2 days/week, balance training daily, aerobic exercise; vitamin D ≥1000 IU/day, calcium 1200 mg/day total, protein 1–1.5 g/kg/day → more muscle and bone, fewer falls and fractures.
Remodeling = osteoclasts resorb, osteoblasts form. RANKL → RANK drives osteoclasts; OPG is the decoy. Sclerostin (osteocytes) brakes formation via Wnt. Osteoporosis = resorption > formation. Drugs target RANKL, the osteoclast, the PTH receptor, the estrogen receptor or sclerostin. Goal = fewer fractures.
Osteoblast / stroma→ RANKL →RANK on osteoclast precursor→Osteoclast formation + activity⊣OPG (decoy)
Osteocyte→ sclerostin ⊣ Wnt →↓ Bone formation· romosozumab blocks sclerostin →↑ Formation
Where each drug acts
| Target | Drug | Effect |
| Osteoclast (hydroxyapatite-bound) | Bisphosphonates | Osteoclast dysfunction/apoptosis → ↓ resorption |
| RANKL | Denosumab (antibody); estrogen (↓ RANKL, ↑ OPG) | ↓ Osteoclast formation/survival |
| Estrogen receptor | Estrogen, raloxifene, CE/bazedoxifene | ↓ Resorption |
| PTH receptor (intermittent) | Teriparatide, abaloparatide | ↑ Osteoblasts → ↑ formation (and resorption) |
| Sclerostin | Romosozumab | ↑ Formation and ↓ resorption |
Memory hookBone strength = density + quality. Antiresorptives protect density; only anabolics rebuild quality (microarchitecture).
HY · Step 1
- RANKL (from osteoblasts) → RANK on osteoclasts; OPG is the decoy. Estrogen ↓ RANKL and ↑ OPG.
- Osteoporosis labs are normal (Ca²⁺, phosphate, PTH, ALP); diagnosis = T-score ≤ −2.5 or a fragility fracture.
LO 2
Classify major osteoporosis medications by mechanism
Key questions
Q9What are the two main classes?
Antiresorptive (anti-remodeling) agents and osteoanabolic agents.
Q10What do antiresorptives do?
Inhibit resorption (more than formation); stabilize or modestly increase BMD; improve strength but do not restore trabecular architecture.
Q11Which drugs are antiresorptive?
Estrogen (± progestin), estrogen/bazedoxifene, raloxifene (estrogen agonist/antagonist), bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid), denosumab (RANKL inhibitor), calcitonin.
Q12What do osteoanabolic agents do?
Activate bone formation; larger BMD gains; restore microarchitecture.
Q13Which anabolics are "remodeling stimulators"?
PTH receptor agonists — teriparatide (PTH 1-34) and abaloparatide (PTHrP analog). They increase formation AND resorption.
Q14Which anabolic has a dual effect?
Romosozumab (anti-sclerostin): a modeling stimulator that increases formation AND decreases resorption.
Q15How do bisphosphonates work?
They bind hydroxyapatite; osteoclasts take them up during resorption → dysfunction and apoptosis. Nitrogen-containing ones inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (mevalonate pathway) → impaired cytoskeleton.
Q16How does denosumab work?
Fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL → blocks RANKL–RANK binding → inhibits osteoclast differentiation and decreases function/survival of mature osteoclasts.
Q17How does intermittent PTH build bone when PTH excess destroys it?
Key paradox: continuous PTH excess → ↑ resorption; intermittent PTH-receptor stimulation preferentially activates osteoblasts (↓ apoptosis, ↑ differentiation) → anabolic.
Q18How does abaloparatide differ from teriparatide?
PTHrP analog that favors the R0 receptor conformation → optimizes anabolic effect with fewer pro-resorptive effects.
Q19What does a bisphosphonate do to the remodeling space?
It slows bone turnover and shrinks the remodeling space — the bone surface under active resorption at any one time.
Q20Are all bisphosphonates equally potent?
No. Risedronate inhibits osteoclasts more strongly than alendronate or ibandronate.
Q21How does estrogen act on the bone cells themselves?
It speeds osteoclast death (apoptosis) and prolongs osteoblast survival, besides lowering RANKL and raising OPG.
Antiresorptive: estrogen, raloxifene, CE/bazedoxifene, bisphosphonates, denosumab, calcitonin → ↓ resorption, no rebuilding. Anabolic: teriparatide/abaloparatide (↑ formation + resorption) and romosozumab (↑ formation, ↓ resorption) → rebuild microarchitecture.
| Class | Drug | Mechanism | Route |
| Antiresorptive | Bisphosphonates: alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid | Bind hydroxyapatite → osteoclast uptake → apoptosis; N-BPs inhibit FPPS | PO (ALN, RIS, IBN); IV yearly (ZOL) |
| Denosumab | Human mAb to RANKL | SC every 6 months |
| Estrogen (± progestin; CE/bazedoxifene) | ↓ RANKL, ↑ OPG, ↓ osteoclasts, ↑ collagen, ↑ gut Ca²⁺ | PO / topical |
| Raloxifene (SERM / EAA) | Estrogen agonist in bone, antagonist in breast, neutral in uterus | PO daily |
| Calcitonin | Direct osteoclast inhibition | — |
| Anabolic | Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) | Intermittent PTH-R stimulation → ↑ osteoblasts (remodeling stimulator) | SC daily |
| Abaloparatide (PTHrP analog) | Same; R0 conformation → less resorption | SC daily |
| Romosozumab | Anti-sclerostin mAb → ↑ formation, ↓ resorption (dual) | SC monthly × 12 |
Memory hooks
- "-dronate" = drown the osteoclast; "-paratide" = parathyroid; "ROMO" = Removes the Osteocyte's brake.
- Anabolics: teriparatide = Two-way (↑ formation + ↑ resorption); romosozumab = Dual (↑ formation, ↓ resorption).
HY · Step 1
- Only anabolic agents improve bone structure (restore microarchitecture).
- Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase.
- PTH paradox: intermittent = anabolic, continuous = catabolic.
LO 3
Identify major indications, contraindications, and adverse effects
Key questions
Q22Bisphosphonates: how are oral forms taken and why?
With 8 oz plain water on an empty stomach, staying upright afterward — poor GI absorption and risk of esophageal irritation.
Q23Bisphosphonate adverse effects?
Oral: esophagitis, dyspepsia, abdominal discomfort. IV: acute-phase reaction (fever, myalgias, flu-like). Serious/rare: osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atypical femoral fractures (AFF), hypocalcemia, renal toxicity (especially IV zoledronic acid).
Q24Bisphosphonate contraindications?
Hypocalcemia and reduced renal function (CrCl <30–35 mL/min); oral forms: significant esophageal disease or inability to stay upright.
Q25Which bisphosphonate is NOT first line and why?
Ibandronate — its pivotal trial reduced only vertebral fractures (not hip or non-vertebral). Alendronate, risedronate and zoledronic acid reduce vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures.
Q26Denosumab indications?
Postmenopausal women and men at high fracture risk; glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis; men on androgen deprivation for prostate cancer; women on aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer.
Q27Denosumab contraindications and adverse effects?
Contraindicated: hypocalcemia (correct first), pregnancy, hypersensitivity. Adverse: eczema/rash/dermatitis, skin infection/cellulitis, rare ONJ and AFF.
Q28What is the denosumab "kidney paradox"?
It is not renally cleared (no dose adjustment), but advanced CKD (eGFR <30, dialysis) carries a much greater risk of SEVERE HYPOCALCEMIA — FDA boxed warning.
Q29Estrogen: mechanism, best use and contraindications?
Preserves bone by ↓ RANKL/↑ OPG, ↓ osteoclasts, ↑ collagen synthesis, ↑ gut Ca²⁺. Best for preventing rapid bone loss in early menopause, especially with vasomotor symptoms. Contraindicated: pregnancy, breast or estrogen-dependent cancer, undiagnosed bleeding, VTE/stroke/MI, migraine with aura.
Q30Estrogen side effects?
Abnormal vaginal bleeding, vaginal candidiasis, breast tenderness, VTE, headache, melasma, ↑ BP, ↑ triglycerides.
Q31Raloxifene: benefits, risks and ideal patient?
Reduces vertebral fractures 30–50% but NOT hip or non-vertebral; reduces ER+ breast cancer risk 50–75%; no uterine cancer risk. Risks: VTE (DVT/PE), hot flashes, leg cramps. Ideal: younger postmenopausal woman at vertebral fracture risk, especially with breast cancer risk, without VTE risk or major menopausal symptoms.
Q32Teriparatide/abaloparatide adverse effects and contraindications?
Adverse: hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria/kidney stones, orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, nausea, headache. Avoid with ↑ osteosarcoma risk: Paget disease, children (open epiphyses), prior skeletal radiation, unexplained ↑ ALP, bone metastases or skeletal malignancy. Contraindicated: hypercalcemia, other metabolic bone disease.
Q33Romosozumab: key risk?
Boxed warning: possible ↑ MI, stroke and cardiovascular death. Do not start within a year of MI or stroke. Also contraindicated with hypocalcemia.
Q34What is estrogen approved for in bone?
Prevention (not treatment) of postmenopausal osteoporosis; it consistently raises spine and hip BMD, with a dose-dependent effect.
Q35What other side effect can oral bisphosphonates cause?
Bone, joint or muscle pain (in addition to GI irritation).
Q36Does high cholesterol rule out raloxifene?
No — raloxifene actually lowers LDL. Its key contraindication is a history of VTE.
Q37How well does denosumab work?
It lowers vertebral fractures by ~68%, hip fractures by ~40% and non-vertebral fractures by ~20%, and raises BMD more than bisphosphonates.
Q38Who gets teriparatide or abaloparatide?
They reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures and are approved for high-risk postmenopausal women, men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis, and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. High risk = prior fragility fracture, multiple risk factors, or failure of/intolerance to other therapy.
Q39How does romosozumab compare?
It raises BMD more than bisphosphonates and reduces vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures. Contraindications: MI/stroke in the past year, uncorrected hypocalcemia, systemic hypersensitivity.
BPs: GI upset (oral), flu-like (IV), rare ONJ/AFF; avoid in hypocalcemia/CKD; ibandronate = vertebral only. Denosumab: severe hypocalcemia in advanced CKD, skin infections. Estrogen: VTE, breast cancer. Raloxifene: VTE; vertebral only; ↓ breast cancer. PTH analogs: hypercalcemia; avoid if osteosarcoma risk. Romosozumab: MI/stroke.
| Drug | Best use / indication | Key adverse effects | Contraindications |
| Alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid | PMO, men, GIO; first line; vertebral + non-vertebral + hip | Esophagitis (PO); acute-phase reaction (IV); ONJ, AFF | Hypocalcemia, CrCl <30–35; esophageal disease, can't stay upright |
| Ibandronate | Vertebral only → not first line | As above | As above |
| Denosumab | High risk; GIO; androgen deprivation; aromatase inhibitors | Eczema, cellulitis, ONJ/AFF; severe hypocalcemia in advanced CKD | Hypocalcemia, pregnancy |
| Estrogen | Early menopause with vasomotor symptoms | VTE, bleeding, breast tenderness, ↑ BP, ↑ TG, melasma | Pregnancy, breast/estrogen-dependent cancer, VTE/stroke/MI, migraine with aura, undiagnosed bleeding |
| Raloxifene | Younger PMO at vertebral risk + breast cancer risk | VTE, hot flashes, leg cramps | VTE history |
| Teriparatide / abaloparatide | High/very high risk; GIO (teriparatide) | Hypercalcemia, kidney stones, orthostatic hypotension | Hypercalcemia; osteosarcoma risk (Paget, open epiphyses, skeletal radiation, ↑ ALP, bone mets) |
| Romosozumab | PMO at high risk | MI, stroke, CV death (boxed); arthralgia, headache | MI/stroke in past year; hypocalcemia |
Memory hooks
- Antiresorptive rare pair: ONJ + AFF ("jaw and thigh").
- Raloxifene = Risk of clots, Reduces breast cancer, Restricted to the spine.
- Romo = Risky for the heart.
HY · Step 1
- Denosumab + advanced CKD → severe hypocalcemia (boxed warning).
- Bisphosphonates: pill esophagitis → take upright with water; contraindicated in hypocalcemia and renal impairment.
- Raloxifene: ↑ VTE, no endometrial cancer risk (vs tamoxifen, which is an endometrial agonist).
- Teriparatide: osteosarcoma in rats → avoid in Paget disease, open epiphyses, prior radiation.
- Bisphosphonates are easily accessible (generic, cheap) — good for uninsured patients.
- Romosozumab raises BMD more than bisphosphonates — but avoid it after MI/stroke in the past year.
- Estrogen preserves bone 4 ways: ↓ RANKL/↑ OPG, ↓ osteoclasts (apoptosis), ↑ collagen synthesis/osteoblast survival, ↑ gut Ca²⁺ absorption.
- Raloxifene's ideal patient: younger postmenopausal woman at vertebral fracture risk who also has breast cancer risk and no VTE history.
LO 4
Choose a reasonable initial therapy based on fracture risk and patient factors
Key questions
Q40What defines low risk and what do you do?
No prior fracture, T-score > −1, low FRAX (<20% MOF, <3% hip) → non-pharmacologic management; may consider estrogen.
Q41What defines moderate risk?
No prior fracture, T-score −1 to −2.5, low FRAX → some benefit from antiresorptive monotherapy: estrogen in early menopause, raloxifene (EAA) in 50s–60s, antiresorptives mid/late 60s.
Q42What defines high risk?
Older single fracture (>2 years ago) or T-score ≤ −2.5, or T-score −1 to −2.5 with high FRAX → an antiresorptive is usually initial therapy (anabolics appropriate for some).
Q43What defines very high risk?
Recent fracture (within 1–2 years), multiple fractures, T-score < −3.0, very high FRAX, or fractures on therapy/glucocorticoids/injurious falls → anabolic first, then a potent antiresorptive.
Q44What is the single most important risk factor for future fracture?
A prior fracture — "fractures beget fractures"; risk is highest in the 1–2 years after a fracture (imminent risk).
Q45Which therapy for a woman in early menopause with hot flashes and bone loss?
Estrogen — ideal to prevent rapid early-menopausal bone loss, especially with vasomotor symptoms; follow with a bisphosphonate when stopping.
Q46A recent vertebral fracture plus an MI 6 months ago?
Very high risk → anabolic first, but avoid romosozumab (MI within a year) → use a PTH analog (teriparatide/abaloparatide), then an antiresorptive.
Q47An uninsured patient at high risk?
An oral bisphosphonate (alendronate/risedronate) — first line, generic, accessible.
Q48Advanced CKD on dialysis with osteoporosis?
Bisphosphonates contraindicated; denosumab is not renally cleared but causes severe hypocalcemia — only if calcium/mineral metabolism can be corrected and closely monitored.
Q49Which class has the strongest fracture-reduction evidence?
Bisphosphonates — the most potent oral antiresorptives with the most robust fracture data.
Q50Postmenopausal, family history of osteoporosis, no fractures, T-score above −2.5 — options?
Raloxifene or a bisphosphonate.
Q51Recent minimal-trauma fracture — estrogen or raloxifene?
Skip both; start a bisphosphonate (or an anabolic if very high risk).
Low → lifestyle ± estrogen. Moderate → estrogen (early menopause) / raloxifene / antiresorptive. High (T ≤ −2.5 or old fracture) → antiresorptive (bisphosphonate). Very high (fracture in past 1–2 yr, multiple fractures, T < −3) → anabolic first, then antiresorptive. Prior fracture = strongest predictor.
| Risk | Definition | Initial therapy |
| Low | No fracture, T > −1, low FRAX | Non-pharmacologic; may consider estrogen |
| Moderate | No fracture, T −1 to −2.5, low FRAX | Estrogen (early menopause) · raloxifene (50s–60s) · antiresorptive (mid/late 60s) |
| High | Old fracture (>2 yr) or T ≤ −2.5 or T −1 to −2.5 with FRAX >20% MOF / >3% hip | Antiresorptive usually first (anabolic for some) |
| Very high | Recent fracture (1–2 yr), multiple fractures, T < −3.0, FRAX >30% MOF / >4.5% hip, fracture on therapy or on glucocorticoids | Anabolic first → then potent antiresorptive |
Pick the drug from the vignette
| Vignette clue | Choose | Avoid |
| Early menopause, hot flashes, low risk of VTE/breast cancer | Estrogen | — |
| Younger postmenopausal, vertebral risk, family history of breast cancer | Raloxifene | If VTE history |
| T ≤ −2.5 or old fracture; uninsured | Oral bisphosphonate (alendronate/risedronate) | Ibandronate as first line; if CKD/hypocalcemia |
| Can't tolerate oral BPs / CKD with close Ca²⁺ monitoring / on aromatase inhibitor or ADT | Denosumab | Uncorrected hypocalcemia |
| Recent fracture, T < −3 | Romosozumab or PTH analog first | — |
| Recent fracture + MI/stroke within 1 year | Teriparatide/abaloparatide | Romosozumab |
| Very high risk + Paget disease or prior skeletal radiation | Romosozumab or potent antiresorptive | PTH analogs (osteosarcoma) |
| Recent minimal-trauma fracture | Skip estrogen/raloxifene → bisphosphonate or anabolic | Estrogen, raloxifene |
Memory hook"Fractures beget fractures" — a recent fracture moves a patient from high to very high risk → build first (anabolic), then protect (antiresorptive).
HY · Step 1
- When fracture risk is very high, begin with an anabolic drug.
- Prior fracture is the single strongest predictor of future fracture; age is next.
- Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: bisphosphonates first line; teriparatide and denosumab also approved.
- Estrogen is ideal for early menopause with vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes).
- Very high risk + MI or stroke within a year → choose a PTH analog (teriparatide/abaloparatide), not romosozumab.
LO 5
Explain why sequencing matters, especially with anabolic agents and denosumab
Key questions
Q52What must follow any anabolic course?
An antiresorptive agent — to consolidate and enhance the gains; without it, the new bone is lost.
Q53Why give the anabolic first?
An anabolic given AFTER antiresorptive therapy has less effect on BMD and fracture risk; given first, gains are larger.
Q54What happens if you switch from denosumab to a PTH analog?
Delay or attenuation of effect or even bone loss, especially at cortical sites (hip).
Q55What happens when denosumab is stopped?
Rebound RANKL activity → rapid rise in resorption, fall in BMD and ↑ risk of multiple vertebral fractures (as early as 7 months, average 19 months after the last dose).
Q56How do you stop denosumab safely?
Do not give doses late, do not casually discontinue — NO drug holiday. If stopping, follow with a bisphosphonate to blunt the rebound.
Q57What is a drug holiday, and for which drugs?
Only for bisphosphonates. After 3–5 years, reassess: if low/moderate risk, a temporary holiday; if still high risk, continue or change. It is a holiday, not retirement — treatment resumes.
Q58Why can bisphosphonates have a holiday?
Long half-life and skeletal retention → benefits wane slowly after stopping; BMD gains plateau after ~4–5 years; atypical femoral fracture risk falls after stopping.
Q59Does any drug keep working after it is stopped?
No — all drugs stop working when stopped; bisphosphonates just wear off slowest. Estrogen and denosumab lose benefit rapidly.
Q60What must follow estrogen when it is stopped?
A bisphosphonate — stopping estrogen causes rapid BMD loss (mimics menopause).
Anabolic first, then antiresorptive (always follow an anabolic). Anabolic after antiresorptive = weaker; after denosumab = possible bone loss. Never stop denosumab without a bisphosphonate (rebound → multiple vertebral fractures). Drug holidays = bisphosphonates only. Stopping estrogen → rapid loss → follow with BP.
Very high risk→Anabolic (teriparatide / abaloparatide / romosozumab)→ must follow with →Antiresorptive (BP or denosumab)→Consolidated BMD gain
Denosumab→ stopped without follow-up →RANKL rebound→Rapid resorption + BMD loss→Multiple vertebral fractures (~7–19 months)
| Drug | After stopping | Holiday? | Follow-on needed |
| Bisphosphonate | Slow offset (skeletal retention) | Yes — after 3–5 yr if risk drops | Resume later |
| Denosumab | Rebound resorption; fracture risk worse than baseline | No | Bisphosphonate |
| Estrogen | Rapid BMD loss | No | Bisphosphonate |
| Teriparatide / abaloparatide | Gains lost | No | Antiresorptive (alendronate studied) |
| Romosozumab | Gains lost | No | Antiresorptive (alendronate or denosumab) |
Memory hook"Build, then lock." Anabolic builds; antiresorptive locks it in. Denosumab never takes a vacation; bisphosphonates are the only ones allowed a holiday.
HY · Step 1
- Anabolic therapy must be followed by an antiresorptive.
- Drug holidays are specific only to bisphosphonates.
- All drugs stop working when stopped — bisphosphonates just wane slowest.
- Estrogen cannot simply be stopped without a follow-on medication.
LO 6
Explain the concept that osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires long-term management tailored to each individual
Key questions
Q61Can osteoporosis be cured?
No — it can be treated effectively and fracture risk reduced, but it is a lifelong disease like diabetes or hypertension.
Q62Should the diagnosis change to "osteopenia" once BMD improves?
No. Retaining the diagnosis avoids a false sense of security, stopping needed medication, loss of insurance coverage and changes in allowed BMD testing frequency.
Q63How long does denosumab work?
No time limit — BMD keeps rising for up to 10 years (no plateau, unlike bisphosphonates), with persistent fracture reduction.
Q64What happens to bisphosphonate benefit over time?
BMD rises for ~4–5 years then plateaus; fracture protection begins within 12 months and persists; reassess at 3–5 years.
Q65What tailors the plan?
Baseline fracture risk, fracture history, comorbidities (CKD, CV disease, VTE, cancer), age/menopause stage, patient preference and shared decision-making.
Q66What does the lecture tell patients in summary?
All approved drugs raise BMD and reduce fractures; only anabolics build new bone; any treatment beats none; very high risk → start anabolic; anabolic must be followed by antiresorptive; holidays only for bisphosphonates; lifelong attention.
Osteoporosis is lifelong: no cure, keep the diagnosis, reassess periodically, sequence and switch rather than stop, and tailor to risk, comorbidities and preference.
| Principle | What it means |
| Chronic disease | Like diabetes/HTN; managed for life; diagnosis retained |
| Reassess | BPs: reassess at 3–5 yr; denosumab: indefinite |
| Sequence | Anabolic → antiresorptive; never stop denosumab or estrogen without follow-on |
| Tailor | Fracture risk + comorbidities + preference (shared decision-making) |
| Foundation | Exercise, balance, calcium, vitamin D, protein, fall prevention |
Memory hookTreat osteoporosis like hypertension: normal numbers on treatment do not mean the disease is gone.
HY · Step 1
- Denosumab BMD keeps rising up to 10 years; bisphosphonates plateau at 4–5 years.
- Exercise and peak bone mass before ~30 lower later osteoporosis risk.
Application questions
1. A 52-year-old woman 1 year past her last period has frequent hot flashes. DXA shows T-score −1.8 at the spine; no fractures, no VTE or breast cancer history. Best option to prevent further bone loss?
- Zoledronic acid
- Estrogen therapy
- Romosozumab
- Teriparatide
- Denosumab
Answer
B. Estrogen is ideal to prevent rapid early-menopausal bone loss, especially with vasomotor symptoms; follow with a bisphosphonate when stopped.
2. A 58-year-old woman with a mother and sister who had breast cancer has a spine T-score of −2.3 and no fractures. She has no menopausal symptoms and no clotting history. Best choice?
- Raloxifene
- Estrogen
- Ibandronate
- Romosozumab
- Calcitonin
Answer
A. Raloxifene lowers vertebral fracture and ER+ breast cancer risk; watch for VTE.
3. A 74-year-old woman had a vertebral fracture 4 months ago; T-score is −3.4. She had a myocardial infarction 5 months ago. Best initial therapy?
- Romosozumab
- Alendronate alone
- Teriparatide followed by an antiresorptive
- Raloxifene
- Observation
Answer
C. Very high risk → anabolic first; romosozumab is avoided within a year of MI/stroke → PTH analog, then antiresorptive.
4. A 70-year-old on hemodialysis receives her first denosumab injection. Two weeks later she has perioral numbness and carpopedal spasm. Cause?
- Hypercalcemia
- Severe hypocalcemia
- Hypokalemia
- Osteonecrosis of the jaw
- Acute-phase reaction
Answer
B. Denosumab in advanced CKD carries a boxed warning for severe hypocalcemia.
5. A woman on denosumab for 6 years decides to stop without further treatment. Ten months later she has several new vertebral fractures. What should have been done?
- Nothing; this is expected with any drug
- A drug holiday was appropriate
- Follow-on bisphosphonate therapy
- Switch to teriparatide immediately
- Add calcitonin
Answer
C. Stopping denosumab causes rebound resorption and multiple vertebral fractures; follow with a bisphosphonate. Holidays apply only to bisphosphonates.
6. A 67-year-old on alendronate for 5 years now has a T-score of −2.0 and no fractures. Next step?
- Continue indefinitely
- Consider a bisphosphonate drug holiday with reassessment
- Switch to ibandronate
- Add denosumab
- Stop all therapy permanently
Answer
B. After 3–5 years, if risk is now low/moderate, a temporary holiday is reasonable — a holiday, not retirement.
7. A patient with Paget disease of bone and a recent hip fracture needs an anabolic agent. Which should be avoided?
- Romosozumab
- Teriparatide
- Zoledronic acid
- Denosumab
- Calcium and vitamin D
Answer
B. PTH analogs are avoided with increased osteosarcoma risk (Paget disease, open epiphyses, prior skeletal radiation, unexplained ↑ ALP).
Each objective opens with the one-line answer. Yellow boxes are high-yield Step 1 add-ons and may go beyond the lecture.